martedì, ottobre 18, 2005

Ricordiamocelo

Russell Roberts su Cafe Hayek ricorda un punto fondamentale riguardo alla guerra in Iraq e alle armi di distruzioni di massa: ossia che forse non c'erano, ma le "menzogne" riguardo ad esse sono attirbuibili a Saddam Hussein piu' che a George Bush:


I don't understand how the failure to find weapons of mass destruction makes the war unjustified. It's not like Bush made up the idea of WMD. Saddam Hussein is the guy you ought to be mad at. Saddam Hussein acted as if he had or was working on nuclear capability. He's the guy who employed nuclear scientists. He's the guy who convinced the UN that he wanted nukes. He's the guy who resisted weapons inspections. He's the guy who said you can look over here but not over there. Why did he do all these things? Either because he actually had nuclear capability or was close to it, or because he wanted to fool people into thinking he was more important than he was. He managed to fool Bill Clinton, the United Nations, George Bush and Israel into thinking he had a desire for WMD. It appears now to have been something of a ruse. Probably. Should Bush have ignored the behavior of Saddam on the grounds that the whole thing was probably a hoax to enhance his self-image? I don't think so. That certainly turned out to be a mistake with Osama. His talk wasn't cheap.


Il resto del post e' altrettanto interessante, anche se per motivi trotalmente differenti

Template Designed by Douglas Bowman - Updated to Beta by: Blogger Team
Modified for 3-Column Layout by Hoctro. Credits: Daryl Lau, Phydeaux3